ApproveMyAction vs. Building Your Own Agent Approval Workflow
Compare a hosted human-approval control with custom databases, chat approvals, and workflow-platform steps for consequential AI-agent actions.
Short answer
Build approval into your own product when verified identity, role rules, custom audit evidence, or deep UI integration are core requirements. Use ApproveMyAction when you need a narrow, short-lived approved/rejected state quickly and can deliver the private review link through your own trusted channel.
The failure this prevents
A production approval feature includes action binding, bearer-token security, expiry, cancellation, a review UI, decision polling, privacy controls, and fail-closed behavior—not merely a button in a chat message.
Recommended workflow
- Write down who is authorized to approve and how your system verifies that identity.
- Bind the reviewer’s display to the exact action, target, and material values.
- Decide how links are delivered, expired, cancelled, logged, and protected.
- Require explicit approved state immediately before execution.
- Add idempotency and an outcome receipt after the approval gate.
Working starting point
Choose custom when: - enterprise SSO or role enforcement is mandatory - approval is a core customer-facing workflow - legal/audit evidence requirements are specialized Choose hosted when: - the caller can securely deliver a private link - a narrow approved/rejected/expired state is sufficient - implementation speed matters
Relevant product: ApproveMyAction · REST + MCP
Decision rule
A bearer-link decision is not verified organizational identity. If identity or role authority is material, integrate that layer explicitly.
Good fit
- You need a working REST/MCP approval gate without building a review UI.
- The application already has a trusted way to reach the intended reviewer.
- A short-lived explicit decision is sufficient.
Use another approach when
- Approver identity must be tied to enterprise SSO and role policy.
- The approval record must satisfy specialized legal or regulatory evidence rules.
- You need complex branching, comments, attachments, or case management.
Options compared
| Option | Strength | Important limitation | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chat reaction | Lowest user friction | Weak action binding and lifecycle | Informal low-risk coordination |
| Workflow platform | Rich routing and integrations | Broader system and configuration surface | Business processes |
| Custom feature | Exact identity, UI, and evidence | Highest engineering and maintenance cost | Core product authorization |
| ApproveMyAction | Narrow hosted state and review page | Caller owns delivery and identity context | Agent action gate |
Implementation cautions
- Do not claim link possession proves identity.
- Do not let edited action parameters reuse an old approval.
- Keep approval URLs out of analytics, referrers, and support screenshots.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use Slack or email to deliver the link?
The calling application controls delivery. Evaluate whether that channel reaches the intended reviewer and protects the bearer URL.
Does approval execute the action?
No. It records decision state; the caller remains responsible for authorization checks and execution.
What if approval expires?
Keep the action blocked and create a new request only if the proposal is still valid.
Related decisions
Next step
Use the product page for exact limitations and access requirements, then copy the corresponding REST or MCP workflow.